DSPs Archives - EFFECT Photonics

Insights

July 24, 2024

What Do Coherent Access Pluggables Need?

Given the success of 400ZR pluggable coherent solutions in the market, discussions in the telecom…

Given the success of 400ZR pluggable coherent solutions in the market, discussions in the telecom sector about a future beyond 400G pluggables have often focused on 800G solutions and 800ZR. However, there is also increasing excitement about “downscaling” to 100G coherent products for applications in the network edge. The industry is labeling these pluggables as 100ZR.

A recently released Heavy Reading survey revealed that over 75% of operators surveyed believe that 100G coherent pluggable optics will be used extensively in their edge and access evolution strategy. In response to this interest from operators, several vendors are keenly jumping on board the 100ZR train by announcing their development projects: : Acacia, Coherent/ADVA, Marvell/InnoLight, and Marvell/OE Solutions.

This growing interest and use cases for 100ZR are also changing how industry analysts view the potential of the 100ZR market. Last February, Cignal AI released a report on 100ZR, which stated that the viability of new low-power solutions in the QSFP28 form factor enabled use cases in access networks, thus doubling the size of their 100ZR shipment forecasts

The access market needs a simple, pluggable, low-cost upgrade to the 10G DWDM optics that it has been using for years. 100ZR is that upgrade. As access networks migrate from 1G solutions to 10G solutions, 100ZR will be a critical enabling technology.”

– Scott Wilkinson, Lead Analyst for Optical Components at Cignal AI.

The 100ZR market can expand even further, however. Access networks are heavily price-conscious, and the lower the prices of 100ZR pluggables become, the more widely they will be adopted. Reaching such a goal requires a vibrant 100ZR ecosystem with multiple suppliers that can provide lasers, digital signal processors (DSPs), and full transceiver solutions that address the access market’s needs and price targets.

The Need for Lower Power

Unlike data centers and the network core, access network equipment lives in uncontrolled environments with limited cooling capabilities. Therefore, every extra watt of pluggable power consumption will impact how vendors and operators design their cabinets and equipment. QSFP-DD modules forced operators and equipment vendors to use larger cooling components (heatsinks and fans), meaning that each module would need more space to cool appropriately. The increased need for cabinet real estate makes these modules more costly to deploy in the access domain.

These struggles are a major reason why QSFP28 form factor solutions are becoming increasingly attractive in the 100ZR domain. Their power consumption (up to 6 watts) is lower than that of QSFP-DD form factors (up to 15 Watts), which allows them to be stacked more densely in access network equipment rooms. Besides, QSFP28 modules are compatible with existing access network equipment, which often features QSFP28 slots.

Figure 2: Comparison between QSFP-DD and QSFP-28 form factors for 100G applications. — Figure 1: Comparing transmit power, noise, size, and cost of line card transponders and different transceiver pluggable modules. Fully integrated QSFP-DD modules include lasers, amplifiers, and filters inside a single PIC, so they can deliver high transmit powers at small size and low cost.

The Need to Overcome Laser and DSP Bottlenecks

Even though QSFP28 modules are better at addressing the power concerns of the access domain, some obstacles prevent their wider availability.

Since QSFP28 pluggables require lower power consumption and slightly smaller footprints, they also need new laser and digital signal processor (DSP) solutions. The industry cannot simply incorporate the same lasers and DSPs used for 400ZR devices. This is why EFFECT Photonics is developing a pico tunable laser assembly (pTLA) and a 100G DSP that will best fit 100ZR solutions in the QSFP28 form factor.

However, a 100ZR industry with only one or two laser and DSP suppliers will struggle to scale up and make these solutions more widely accessible. The 400ZR market provides a good example of the benefits of a vibrant ecosystem. This larger vendor ecosystem helps 400ZR production scale up in volume and satisfy a rapidly growing market.

The Need for Standards and Interoperability

Another reason 400ZR solutions became so widespread is their standardization and interoperability. Previously, the 400G space was more fragmented, and pluggables from different vendors could not operate with each other, forcing operators to use a single vendor for their entire network deployment.

Eventually, datacom and telecom providers approached their suppliers and the Optical Internetworking Forum (OIF) about the need to develop an interoperable 400G coherent solution that addressed their needs. These discussions and technology development led the OIF to publish the 400ZR implementation agreement in 2020. This standardization and interoperability effort enabled the explosive growth of the 400G market.

100ZR solutions must follow a similar path to reach a larger market. If telecom and datacom operators want more widespread and affordable 100ZR solutions, more of them will have to join the push for 100ZR standardization and interoperability. This includes standards not just for the power consumption and line interfaces but also for management and control interfaces, enabling more widespread use of remote provisioning and diagnostics. These efforts will make 100ZR devices easier to implement across access networks standards-compatible modes for interoperability or in high-performance modes that use proprietary features.

Takeaways

The demand from access network operators for 100ZR solutions is there, but it has yet to fully materialize in the industry forecasts because, right now, there is not enough supply of viable 100ZR solutions that can address their targets. So in a way, further growth of the 100ZR market is a self-fulfilled prophecy: the more suppliers and operators support 100ZR, the easier it is to scale up the supply and meet the price and power targets of access networks, expanding the potential market. Instead of one or two vendors fighting for control of a smaller 100ZR pie, having multiple vendors and standardization efforts will increase the supply, significantly increasing the size of the pie and benefiting everyone’s bottom line.

Therefore, EFFECT Photonics believes in the vision of a 100ZR ecosystem where multiple vendors can provide affordable laser, DSP, and complete transceiver solutions tailored to network edge use cases. Meanwhile, if network operators push towards greater standardization and interoperability, 100ZR solutions can become even more widespread and easy to use.

PDF Download

Tags: 100G Coherent Products, 100ZR, 400ZR, 800G Solutions, 800ZR, Acacia, access networks, Cignal AI report, Coherent/ADVA, DSPs, DWDM optics, Heavy Reading survey, lasers, Marvell/InnoLight, Marvell/OE Solutions, operators, power consumption, QSFP-DD form factors, QSFP28 form factor, Scott Wilkinson, vendors

Insights

April 17, 2024

Coherent Transceivers at a Low Latency

Latency, the time it takes for data to travel from its source to its destination,…

Latency, the time it takes for data to travel from its source to its destination, is a critical metric in modern networks. Reducing latency is paramount in the context of 5G and emerging technologies like edge computing.

Smaller data centers placed locally (also called edge data centers) have the potential to minimize latency, overcome inconsistent connections, and store and compute data closer to the end-user. Various trends are driving the rise of the edge cloud:

5G technology and the Internet of Things (IoT): These mobile networks and sensor networks need low-cost computing resources closer to the user to reduce latency and better manage the higher density of connections and data.
Content delivery networks (CDNs): The popularity of CDN services continues to grow, and most web traffic today is served through CDNs, especially for major sites like Facebook, Netflix, and Amazon. By using content delivery servers that are more geographically distributed and closer to the edge and the end user, websites can reduce latency, load times, and bandwidth costs as well as increasing content availability and redundancy.
Software-defined networks (SDN) and Network function virtualization (NFV): The increased use of SDNs and NFV requires more cloud software processing.
Augment and virtual reality applications (AR/VR): Edge data centers can reduce streaming latency and improve the performance of AR/VR applications. Cloud-native applications are driving the construction of edge infrastructure and services. However, they cannot distribute their processing capabilities without considerable investments in real estate, infrastructure deployment, and management.

Several of these applications require lower latencies than before, and centralized cloud computing cannot deliver those data packets quickly enough. Let’s explore what changes are happening in edge networks to meet these latency demands and what impact will that have on transceivers.

The Different Latency Demands of the Cloud Edge

As shown in Table 1, a data center on a town or suburb aggregation point could halve the latency compared to a centralized hyperscale data center. Enterprises with their own data center on-premises can reduce latencies by 12 to 30 times compared to hyperscale data centers.

Types of Edge Data Centres

Types of Edge	Data center	Location	Number of DCs per 10M people	Average Latency	Size
On-premises edge	Enterprise site	Businesses	NA	2-5 ms	1 rack max
Network (Mobile)	Tower edge	Tower	Nationwide	3000	10 ms	2 racks max
Outer edge	Aggregation points	Town	150	30 ms	2-6 racks
Inner edge	Core	Major city	10	40 ms	10+ racks
Regional edge	Regional edge	Regional	Major city	100	50 ms	100+ racks
Not edge	Not edge	Hyperscale	State/national	1	60+ ms	5000+ racks

Types of Edge

Data center

Location

Number of DCs per 10M people

Average Latency

Size

On-premises edge

Enterprise site

Businesses

NA

2-5 ms

1 rack max

Network (Mobile)

Tower edge

Tower

Nationwide

3000

10 ms

2 racks max

Outer edge

Aggregation points

Town

150

30 ms

2-6 racks

Inner edge

Core

Major city

10

40 ms

10+ racks

Regional edge

Regional

Major city

100

50 ms

100+ racks

Not edge

Hyperscale

State/national

1

60+ ms

5000+ racks

Types of edge data centers and their characteristics. Source: STL Partners

Cisco estimates that 85 zettabytes of useful raw data were created in 2021, but only 21 zettabytes were stored and processed in data centers. Edge data centers can help close this gap. For example, industries or cities can use edge data centers to aggregate all the data from their sensors. Instead of sending all this raw sensor data to the core cloud, the edge cloud can process it locally and turn it into a handful of performance indicators. The edge cloud can then relay these indicators to the core, which requires a much lower bandwidth than sending the raw data.

Using Coherent Technology in the Edge Cloud

As edge data center interconnects became more common, the issue of interconnecting them became more prominent. Direct detect technology had been the standard in data center interconnects. However, reaching distances greater than 50km and bandwidths over 100Gbps required for modern edge data center interconnects required external amplifiers and dispersion compensators that increased the complexity of network operations.

At the same time, advances in electronic and photonic integration allowed longer-reach coherent technology to be miniaturized into QSFP-DD and OSFP form factors. This progress allowed the Optical Internetworking Forum (OIF) to create the 400ZR and ZR+ standards for 400G DWDM pluggable modules. With modules that are small enough to pack a router faceplate densely, the datacom sector could profit from a 400ZR solution for high-capacity data center interconnects of up to 80km. The rise of 100G ZR technology takes this philosophy a step further, with a product aimed at spreading coherent technology further into edge and access networks.

How Does Latency in the Edge Affect DSP Requirements?

The traditional disadvantage of coherent technology vs direct detection is that coherent signal processing takes more time and computational resources and, therefore, introduces more latency in the network. Adapting to the latency requirements of the network edge might, especially in shorter link distances, might require digital signal processors (DSPs) to adopt a “lighter” version of the signal processing normally used in coherent technology.

Let’s give an example of how DSPs could behave differently in these cases. The quality of the light signal degrades when traveling through an optical fiber by a process called dispersion. The same phenomenon happens when a prism splits white light into several colors. The fiber also adds other distortions due to nonlinear optical effects.

These effects get worse as the input power of the light signal increases, leading to a trade-off. You might want more power to transmit over longer distances, but the nonlinear distortions also become larger, which beats the point of using more power. The DSP performs several operations on the light signal to try to offset these dispersion and nonlinear distortions.

Asset 7 dispersion in optical fibers — Figure 1: Explaining dispersion compensation in optical fibers. A pulse of light will spread out and distort due to dispersion effects.

However, shorter-reach connections require less dispersion compensation, presenting an opportunity to streamline the processing done by a DSP. A lighter coherent implementation could reduce the use of dispersion compensation blocks. This significantly lowers system power consumption and latency too.

Another way to reduce processing and latency in shorter-reach data center links is to use less powerful forward error correction (FEC) in DSPs. You can learn more about FEC in one of our previous articles.

Takeaways

The shift towards edge data centers tries to address the low latency requirements in modern telecom networks. By decentralizing data storage and processing, closer to the point of use, edge computing reduces latency but also enhances the efficiency and reliability of network services across various applications, from IoT and 5G to content delivery and AR/VR experiences.

The use of coherent transceiver technology helps edge networks span longer reaches with higher capacity, but it also comes with the trade-off of increased latency due to more signal processing from the DSP. This scenario means that DSPs will have to reduce the use of certain processing blocks, such as dispersion compensation and FEC, to meet the specific latency requirements of edge computing.

Article PDF

Tags: 5G, applications, AR/VR, CDNs, cloud, data, data centers, demands, DSPs, Edge computing, EFFECT Photonics, infrastructure, latency, Networks, NFV, processing, SDN, services, technology, Transceivers, trends

Insights

November 9, 2023

What DSPs Do Optics in Space Need?

The space sector is experiencing rapid growth, driven by numerous privately-owned initiatives aiming to reduce…

The space sector is experiencing rapid growth, driven by numerous privately-owned initiatives aiming to reduce the cost of space flight. As this sector expands, it presents new opportunities for developing optical components in space and satellite communications.

Graph-cost-space-flight — *Figure 1: The cost of a kilogram of payload into space since 2000. Source: Visual Capitalist (data from the Center for Strategic and International Studies)*

However, the challenges associated with the space environment required digital signal processors (DSPs) optimized for optical communications in space. Unlike traditional fiber transmission systems, DSPs for space need to be optimized for receiver sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio, adapt to signal recovery in the presence of frequent signal losses, and comply with stringent space certification standards.

Signal to Noise Ratio Over Dispersion

In traditional optical fiber communications, the presence of dispersion often leads to signal distortions that require extensive dispersion compensation techniques. However, space is a vacuum medium devoid of most dispersion-related challenges. Consequently, DSPs developed for space-based optical communications do not require the same level of dispersion compensation as their fiber counterparts. Instead, the primary focus shifts toward optimizing receiver sensitivity and improving the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to ensure reliable data transmission in space.

Optical signals travel enormous distances in space and will be extremely weak when they reach a receiver. Focusing DSP performance on enhancing the receiver’s sensitivity enables more accurate detection of these weak optical signals.

To achieve this goal, DSPs for space-based optical communications need forward error correction (FEC) methods that are even more robust than FEC used for ground links. These methods employ sophisticated coding techniques that introduce redundancy in the transmitted data, allowing for efficient error detection and correction.

network link with FEC — Figure 2: Simplified diagram of a network link with forward error correction (FEC). The FEC encoder adds a series of redundant bits (called overhead) to the transmitted data stream. The receiver can use this overhead to check for errors without asking the transmitter to resend the data.

Handling Signal Losses in Space

In contrast to optical fiber communications, where signal losses are typically infrequent but often fatal, space-based optical communications experience more frequent but non-fatal signal losses. Therefore, DSPs designed for space must be optimized to handle these intermittent signal losses and ensure efficient signal recovery.

While DSPs for fiber optical links on the ground often rely solely on their error correction methods, DSPs for space-based optical communications might ask more frequently for the signal to be retransmitted. This retransmission can increase the link latency significantly, which can be compensated in part by using satellite networks to provide more redundancy. You can read more about these satellite networks in one of our previous articles.

Space Certification and Standards

While industrial or commercial temperature certifications are typically sufficient for optical fiber transceivers and their components, DSPs designed for space-based optical communications must adhere to more stringent space certification standards. Space certification ensures that DSPs can withstand the extreme temperatures, vacuum conditions, and radiation exposure prevalent in space environments.

*Figure 3: The James Webb Telescope. Space Observatory for the Study of the Universe and exploration of deep space*

Our testing facilities and partners include capabilities for the temperature cycling and reliability testing needed to match Telcordia standards, such as temperature cycling ovens and chambers with humidity control.

Takeaways

The testing process for photonic integrated circuits ensures their reliability and performance. Device-level testing focuses on individual components, allowing for precise characterization and identification of faulty elements. Functional testing evaluates the overall performance of the PIC, ensuring adherence to design specifications. Reliability testing assesses the robustness and lifespan of the PIC under various operating conditions.

Download Article – PDF

Tags: 5G, certification, Coherent Optical Systems, Data center architecture, dispersion, DSP, DSPs, DVT, Electrical Power, free space optics, Networks, noise ratio, noise ratiom, Optical System-On-Chip (SoC), optics in space, Photonic Integrated Circuit, Photonics, PICs, Pluggable Transceivers, signal, signal loss, space, standard

Insights

July 19, 2023

Towards a Zero Touch Coherent Network

Telecommunication service providers face a critical challenge: how to incorporate affordable and compact coherent pluggables…

Telecommunication service providers face a critical challenge: how to incorporate affordable and compact coherent pluggables into their networks while ensuring optimal performance and coverage across most network links.

Automation will be pivotal in achieving affordable and sustainable networks. Software defined networks (SDNs) facilitate network function virtualization (NFV), empowering operators to implement various functions for network management and orchestration. By incorporating an artificial intelligence (AI) layer for management and orchestration with the SDN/NFV framework, operators can unlock even greater benefits, as depicted in the diagram below.

carrier-network — Figure 1: Example of a carrier network with different applications (mobile, home, office) automated via SDN control and AI management.

Nevertheless, achieving a fully automated network requires interfacing with the physical layer of the network. This requires intelligent, coherent pluggables capable of adapting to diverse network requirements.

Zero Touch Networks and the Physical Layer

Telecom and datacom providers aiming to achieve market leadership must scale their operations while efficiently and dynamically allocating existing network resources. SDNs offer a pathway to accomplish this by decoupling switching hardware from software, thereby enabling the virtualization of network functions through a centralized controller unit. This centralized management and orchestration (MANO) layer can implement network functions that switches alone cannot handle, enabling intelligent and dynamic allocation of network resources. This enhanced flexibility and optimization yield improved network outcomes for operators.

Figure 2: Comparing a traditional network approach (left) with an SDN/NFC approach (right).

However, the forthcoming 5G networks will introduce a multitude of devices, software applications, and technologies. Managing these new devices and use cases necessitates self-managed, touchless automated networks. Realizing the full potential of network automation requires the flow of sensor and control data across all OSI model layers, including the physical layer.

As networks grow larger and more complex, MANO software necessitates greater degrees of freedom and adjustability. Next-generation MANO software must optimize both the physical and network layers to achieve the best network fit. Attaining this objective demands intelligent optical equipment and components that can be diagnosed and managed remotely from the MANO layer. This is where smart pluggable transceivers with reconfigurable DSPs come into play.

The Role of Forward Error Correction

Forward error correction (FEC) implemented by DSPs serves as a crucial component in coherent communication systems. FEC enhances the tolerance of coherent links to noise, enabling longer reach and higher capacity. Thanks to FEC, coherent links can handle bit error rates that are a million times higher than those of typical direct detect links. In simpler terms, FEC algorithms allow the DSP to enhance link performance without necessitating hardware changes. This enhancement can be compared to image processing algorithms improving the quality of images produced by phone cameras.

When coherent transmission technology emerged, all FEC algorithms were proprietary, guarded closely by equipment and component manufacturers due to their competitive advantage. Consequently, coherent transceivers from different vendors were incompatible, and network deployment required reliance on a single vendor.

However, as data center providers pushed for deeper disaggregation in communication networks, the need for interoperability in coherent transceivers became evident, leading to the standardization of FEC algorithms. The OIF 400ZR standard for data center interconnects adopted a public algorithm called concatenated FEC (CFEC). In contrast, some 400ZR+ MSA standards employ open FEC (oFEC), which provides greater reach at the expense of additional bandwidth and energy consumption. For the longest link lengths (500+ kilometers), proprietary FECs are still necessary for 400G transmission. Nevertheless, public FEC standards have achieved interoperability for a significant portion of the 400G transceiver market.

The Promise of the Smart Transceiver

The realization of a smart coherent pluggable capable of addressing various applications—data centers, carrier networks, SDNs—relies on an equally intelligent and adaptable DSP. The DSP must be reconfigurable through software to adapt to diverse network conditions and use cases.

For instance, a smart DSP could switch between different FEC algorithms to match network performance and use case requirements. Consider the scenario of upgrading a 650-kilometer-long metro link running at 100 Gbps with open FEC to achieve a capacity of 400 Gbps. Open FEC might struggle to deliver the required link performance. However, if the DSP can be reconfigured to employ a proprietary FEC standard, the transceiver would be capable of handling this upgraded link.

	400ZR	Open ZR+	Proprietary Long Haul
Target Application	Edge data center interconnect	Metro, Regional data center interconnect	Long-Haul Carrier
Target Reach @ 400G	120km	500km	1000 km
Form Factor	QSFP-DD/OSFP	QSFP-DD/OSFP	QSFP-DD/OSFP
FEC	CFEC	oFEC	Proprietary
Standards / MSA	OIF	OpenZR+ MSA	Proprietary

Table 1: Summary of different use cases and standards for a 400G pluggable transceiver.

Reconfigurable DSPs also prove beneficial in auto-configuring links to address specific network conditions, particularly in brownfield links. For example, if the link possesses high-quality fiber, the DSP could be reconfigured to transmit at a higher baud rate. Conversely, if the fiber quality is poor, the DSP could scale down the baud rate to mitigate bit errors. Furthermore, if the smart pluggable detects a relatively short fiber length, it could reduce laser transmitter power or DSP power consumption to conserve energy.

Takeaways

Smart coherent access pluggables would greatly simplify network upgrades. The DSP to match this pluggable should be able to use different error correction levels to handle different reach and future zero-touch network requirements.

The DSP can not only introduce software corrections but also effectuate optical hardware adjustments (output power, amplifier control) to adapt to different noise scenarios. Through these adaptations, the next generation of pluggable transceivers will proficiently handle the telecom carrier and data center use cases presented to them.

Article PDF

Tags: 100G ZR, adaptable, AI, artificial intelligence, automation, Coherent pluggables, cost, data layer, DSPs, FEC, forward error correction, network layer, Network management and orchestration, network requirements, OPEX, physical layer, programmability, Proprietary, reach, reconfigurable, remote, SDNs, Service Providers, smart, Smart pluggable transceivers, software defined, Software-Defined Networks, standardized, standards, telecommunication, versatile, virtualization

Insights

March 29, 2023

What DSPs Does the Cloud Edge Need?

By storing and processing data closer to the end user and reducing latency, smaller data…

By storing and processing data closer to the end user and reducing latency, smaller data centers on the network edge significantly impact how networks are designed and implemented. These benefits are causing the global market for edge data centers to explode, with PWC predicting that it will nearly triple from $4 billion in 2017 to $13.5 billion in 2024. Various trends are driving the rise of the edge cloud: 5G networks and the Internet of Things (IoT), augmented and virtual reality applications, network function virtualization, and content delivery networks.

Several of these applications require lower latencies than before, and centralized cloud computing cannot deliver those data packets quickly enough. As shown in Table 1, a data center on a town or suburb aggregation point could halve the latency compared to a centralized hyperscale data center. Enterprises with their own data center on-premises can reduce latencies by 12 to 30 times compared to hyperscale data centers.

Type of Edge		Datacenter	Location	Number of DCs per 10M people	Average Latency	Size
On-premises edge		Enterprise site	Businesses	NA	2-5 ms	1 rack max
Network (Mobile)	Tower edge	Tower	Nationwide	3000	10 ms	2 racks max
	Outer edge	Aggregation points	Town	150	30 ms	2-6 racks
	Inner edge	Core	Major city	10	40 ms	10+ racks
Regional edge		Regional	Major city	100	50 ms	100+ racks
Not edge		Hyperscale	State/national	1	60+ ms	5000+ racks

Table 1: Types of edge data centers and their characteristics. Source: STL Partners

This situation leads to hyperscale data center providers cooperating with telecom operators to install their servers in the existing carrier infrastructure. For example, Amazon Web Services (AWS) is implementing edge technology in carrier networks and company premises (e.g., AWS Wavelength, AWS Outposts). Google and Microsoft have strategies and products that are very similar. In this context, edge computing poses a few problems for telecom providers. They must manage hundreds or thousands of new nodes that will be hard to control and maintain.

These conditions mean that optical transceivers for these networks, and thus their digital signal processors (DSPs), must have flexible and low power consumption and smart features that allow them to adapt to different network conditions.

Using Adaptable Power Settings

Reducing power consumption in the cloud edge is not just about reducing the maximum power consumption of transceivers. Transceivers and DSPs must also be smart and decide whether to operate on low- or high-power mode depending on the optical link budget and fiber length. For example, if the transceiver must operate at its maximum capacity, a programmable interface can be controlled remotely to set the amplifiers at maximum power. However, if the operator uses the transceiver for just half of the maximum capacity, the transceiver can operate with lower power on the amplifiers. The transceiver uses energy more efficiently and sustainably by adapting to these circumstances.

Fiber monitoring is also an essential variable in this equation. A smart DSP could change its modulation scheme or lower the power of its semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA) if telemetry data indicates a good quality fiber. Conversely, if the fiber quality is poor, the transceiver can transmit with a more limited modulation scheme or higher power to reduce bit errors. If the smart pluggable detects that the fiber length is relatively short, the laser transmitter power or the DSP power consumption could be scaled down to save energy.

The Importance of a Co-Design Philosophy for DSPs

Transceiver developers often source their DSP, laser, and optical engine from different suppliers, so all these chips are designed separately. This setup reduces the time to market and simplifies the research and design processes, but it comes with performance and power consumption trade-offs.

In such cases, the DSP is like a Swiss army knife: a jack of all trades designed for different kinds of PIC but a master of none. Given the ever-increasing demand for capacity and the need for sustainability both as financial and social responsibility, transceiver developers increasingly need a steak knife rather than a Swiss army knife.

As we explained in a previous article about fit-for-platform DSPs, a transceiver optical engine designed on the indium phosphide platform could be designed to run at a voltage compatible with the DSP’s signal output. This way, the optimized DSP could drive the PIC directly without needing a separate analog driver, doing away with a significant power conversion overhead compared to a silicon photonics setup, as shown in the figure below.

Figure 1: Comparison between the drive power and power consumption of three different PIC + DSP pairings: standard DSP with a silicon PIC, standard DSP with an InP PIC, and an optimized DSP with an InP.

Scaling the Edge Cloud with Automation

With the rise of edge data centers, telecom providers must manage hundreds or thousands of new nodes that will take much work to control and maintain. Furthermore, providers also need a flexible network with pay-as-you-go scalability that can handle future capacity needs. Automation is vital to achieving such flexibility and scalability.

Automation potential improves further by combining artificial intelligence with the software-defined networks (SDNs) framework that virtualizes and centralizes network functions. This creates an automated and centralized management layer that can allocate resources efficiently and dynamically. For example, the AI network controller can take telemetry data from the whole network to decide where to route traffic and adjust power levels, reducing power consumption.

Figure 2: Comparing a traditional network approach (left) with an SDN/NFC approach (right).

In this context, smart digital signal processors (DSPs) and transceivers can give the AI controller more degrees of freedom to optimize the network. They could provide more telemetry to the AI controller so that it makes better decisions. The AI management layer can then remotely control programmable interfaces in the transceiver and DSP so that the optical links can adjust the varying network conditions. If you want to know more about these topics, you can read last week’s article about transceivers in the age of AI.

Takeaways

Cloud-native applications require edge data centers that handle increased traffic and lower network latency. However, their implementation came with the challenges of more data center interconnects and a massive increase in nodes to manage. Scaling edge data center networks will require greater automation and more flexible power management, and smarter DSPs and transceivers will be vital to enable these goals.

Co-design approaches can optimize the interfacing of the DSP with the optical engine, making the transceiver more power efficient. Further power consumption gains can also be achieved with smarter DSPs and transceivers that provide telemetry data to centralized AI controllers. These smart network components can then adjust their power output based on the decisions and instructions of the AI controller.

Tags: 5G, AI, artificial intelligence, Augmented Reality, automation, cloud edge, Co-Design Philosophy, data centers, Delivery Networks, DSPs, Edge Cloud, Fiber Monitoring, Hyperscale Data Center, Internet of Things, IoT, latency, Network Function Virtualization, optical transceivers, power consumption, Software-Defined Networks, Telecom Operators, Virtual Reality

Insights

January 4, 2023

What is 100ZR and Why Does it Matter?

In June 2022, transceiver developer II‐VI Incorporated (now Coherent Corp.) and optical networking solutions provider…

In June 2022, transceiver developer II‐VI Incorporated (now Coherent Corp.) and optical networking solutions provider ADVA announced the launch of the industry’s first 100ZR pluggable coherent transceiver. Discussions in the telecom sector about a future beyond 400G coherent technology have usually focused on 800G products, but there is increasing excitement about “downscaling” to 100G coherent products for certain applications in the network edge and business services. This article will discuss the market and technology forces that drive this change in discourse.

The Need for 100G Transmission in Telecom Deployments

The 400ZR pluggables that have become mainstream in datacom applications are too expensive and power-hungry for the optical network edge. Therefore, operators are strongly interested in 100G pluggables that can house coherent optics in compact form factors, just like 400ZR pluggables do. The industry is labeling these pluggables as 100ZR.

A recently released Heavy Reading survey revealed that over 75% of operators surveyed believe that 100G coherent pluggable optics will be used extensively in their edge and access evolution strategy. However, this interest had not really materialized into a 100ZR market because no affordable or power-efficient products were available. The most the industry could offer was 400ZR pluggables that were “powered-down” for 100G capacity.

Graph 100G coherent pluggables — Figure 1. Distribution of responses to a Heavy Reading survey question: how important are 100G coherent pluggable optics for your edge/access evolution strategy? The sample was composed of 87 people who work for network operators worldwide and are involved in network planning or purchasing network equipment. Source: Heavy Reading

100ZR and its Enabling Technologies

With the recent II-VI Incorporated and ADVA announcement, the industry is showing its first attempts at a native 100ZR solution that can provide a true alternative to the powered-down 400ZR products. Some of the key specifications of this novel 100ZR solution include:

A QSFP28 form factor, very similar but slightly smaller than a QSFP-DD
5 Watt power consumption
C-temp and I-temp certifications to handle harsh environments

The 5 Watt-power requirement is a major reduction compared to the 15-Watt specification of 400ZR transceivers in the QSFP-DD form factor. Achieving this spec requires a digital signal processor (DSP) that is specifically optimized for the 100G transceiver.

Transceiver developers often source their DSP, laser, and optical engine from different suppliers, so all these chips are designed separately from each other. This setup reduces the time to market, simplifies the research and design processes, but comes with performance and power consumption trade-offs.

In such cases, the DSP is like a Swiss army knife: a jack of all trades designed for different kinds of optical engines but a master of none. DSPs co-designed and optimized for their specific optical engine and laser can significantly improve power efficiency. You can read more about co-design approaches in one of our previous articles.

Achieving 100ZR Cost-Efficiency through Scale

Making 100ZR coherent optical transceivers more affordable is also a matter of volume production. As discussed in a previous article, if PIC production volumes can increase from a few thousand chips per year to a few million, the price per optical chip can decrease from thousands of Euros to mere tens of Euros. Such manufacturing scale demands a higher upfront investment, but the result is a more accessible product that more customers can purchase.

Graph-cost-per-PIC — Figure 2: Modelling of photonic integrated chip (PIC) cost as a function of aggregate number of PICs produced per year. Exponential increases in production lead to an exponential decrease in cost. Source: Model and graph provided by Prof. Meint Smit, TU Eindhoven.

Achieving this production goal requires photonics manufacturing chains to learn from electronics and leverage existing electronics manufacturing processes and ecosystems. Furthermore, transceiver developers must look for trusted large-scale manufacturing partners to guarantee a secure and high-volume supply of chips and packages.

If you want to know more about how photonics developers can leverage electronic ecosystems and methods, we recommend you read our in-depth piece on the subject.

Takeaways

As the Heavy Reading survey showed, the interest in 100G coherent pluggable optics for edge/access applications is strong, and operators have identified use key use cases within their networks. In the past, there were no true 100ZR solutions that could address this interest, but the use of optimized DSPs and light sources, as well as high-volume manufacturing capabilities, can finally deliver a viable and affordable 100ZR product.

Tags: 100G coherent, 100ZR, DSP, DSPs, edge and access applications, EFFECT Photonics, Photonics

Core Industries

Emerging Industries

Our Technology

Pluggable Modules – Coherent

Sub-Assemblies

ASICs

View All

Insights

Press Releases

In the News

Events

Careers

Knowledge Center

Company Info

Contact Us

Media Partners:

Core Industries

Emerging Industries

Our Technology

Pluggable Modules – Coherent

Sub-Assemblies

ASICs

View All

Insights

Press Releases

In the News

Events

Careers

Knowledge Center

Company Info

Contact Us

Core Industries

Emerging Industries

Our Technology

Pluggable Modules – Coherent

Sub-Assemblies

ASICs

View All

Insights

Press Releases

In the News

Events

Careers

Knowledge Center

Company Info

Contact Us

DSPs

The Need for Lower Power

The Need to Overcome Laser and DSP Bottlenecks

The Need for Standards and Interoperability

Takeaways

ECOC Celebrating 50 years:

Key Highlights:

Premium Sponsors:

Media Partners:

The Different Latency Demands of the Cloud Edge

Types of Edge Data Centres

Using Coherent Technology in the Edge Cloud

How Does Latency in the Edge Affect DSP Requirements?

Takeaways

What to Expect in 2024:

Key Highlights:

Signal to Noise Ratio Over Dispersion

Handling Signal Losses in Space

Space Certification and Standards

Takeaways

Explore Our ECOC2023 Demos:

Zero Touch Networks and the Physical Layer

The Role of Forward Error Correction

The Promise of the Smart Transceiver

Takeaways

Using Adaptable Power Settings

The Importance of a Co-Design Philosophy for DSPs

Scaling the Edge Cloud with Automation

Takeaways

Explore Our OFC2023 Demos:

The Need for 100G Transmission in Telecom Deployments

100ZR and its Enabling Technologies

Achieving 100ZR Cost-Efficiency through Scale

Takeaways

Core Industries

Emerging Industries

Our Technology

Pluggable Modules – Coherent

Sub-Assemblies

ASICs

View All

Insights

Press Releases

In the News

Events

Careers

Knowledge Center

Company Info

Contact Us