scale Archives - EFFECT Photonics

Banner Remote Provisioning and Management For Edge Networks

Insights

January 11, 2023

Remote Provisioning and Management for Edge Networks

Smaller data centers near the end user can reduce latency, overcome inconsistencies in connectivity, and…

Smaller data centers near the end user can reduce latency, overcome inconsistencies in connectivity, and store and compute data closer to the end user. According to PricewaterhouseCoopers, these advantages will drive the worldwide market for edge data centers to more than triple from $4 billion in 2017 to $13.5 billion in 2024. With the increased use of edge computing, more high-speed transceivers are required to link edge data centers. According to Cignal AI, the number of 100G equivalent ports sold for edge applications will double between 2022 and 2025, as indicated in the graph below.

Figure 1: Forecast of 100G port equivalents shipped for edge applications. These shipments are overwhelmingly 400ZR standard technology. Source: Cignal AI Transport Applications Report Q42021.

The increase in edge infrastructure comes with many network provisioning and management challenges. While typical data centers were built in centralized and controlled environments, edge deployments will live in remote and uncontrolled environments because they need to be close to where the data is generated. For example, edge infrastructure could be a server plugged into the middle of a busy factory floor to collect data more quickly from their equipment sensors.

This increase in edge infrastructure will provide plenty of headaches to network operators who also need to scale up their networks to handle the increased bandwidths and numbers of connections. More truck rolls must be done to update more equipment, and this option won’t scale cost-effectively, which is why many companies simply prefer not to upgrade and modernize their infrastructure.

Towards Zero-Touch Provisioning

A zero-touch provisioning model would represent a major shift in an operator’s ability to upgrade their network equipment. The network administrator could automate the configuration and provisioning of each unit from their central office, ship the units to each remote site, and the personnel in that site (who don’t need any technical experience!) just need to power up the unit. After turning them on, they could be further provisioned, managed, and monitored by experts anywhere in the world.

The optical transceivers potentially connected to some of these edge nodes already have the tools to be part of such a zero-touch provisioning paradigm. Many transceivers have a plug-and-play operation that does not require an expert on the remote site. For example, the central office can already program and determine specific parameters of the optical link, such as temperature, wavelength drift, dispersion, or signal-to-noise ratio, or even what specific wavelength to use. The latter wavelength self-tuning application is shown in Figure 2.

Once plugged in, the transceiver will set the operational parameters as programmed and communicate with the central office for confirmation. These provisioning options make deployment much easier for network operators.

Figure 2: Short description and comparison of different approaches to wavelength tuning in optical transceivers, with the last one on the right being the self-tuning module.

Enabling Remote Diagnostics and Management

The same channel that establishes parameters remotely during the provisioning phase can also perform monitoring and diagnostics afterward. The headend module in the central office could remotely modify certain aspects of the tail-end module in the remote site, effectively enabling several remote management and diagnostics options. The figure below provides a visualization of such a scenario.

Figure 3: Visualization of remote diagnostics in an optical link. The headend module can check read tail-end module diagnostics such as wavelength channel number, temperature, transmitter, and receiver power.

The central office can remotely measure metrics such as the transceiver temperature and power transmitted and received. These metrics can provide a quick and useful health check of the link. The headend module can also remotely read alarms for low/high values of these metrics.

These remote diagnostics and management features can eliminate certain truck rolls and save more operational expenses. They are especially convenient when dealing with very remote and hard-to-reach sites (e.g., an antenna tower) that require expensive truck rolls.

Remote Diagnostics and Control for Energy Sustainability

To talk about the impact of remote control on energy sustainability, we first must review the concept of performance margins. This number is a vital measure of received signal quality. It determines how much room there is for the signal to degrade without impacting the error-free operation of the optical link.

In the past, network designers played it safe, maintaining large margins to ensure a robust network operation in different conditions. However, these higher margins usually require higher transmitter power and power consumption. Network management software can use the remote diagnostics provided by this new generation of transceivers to develop tighter, more accurate optical link budgets in real time that require lower residual margins. This could lower the required transceiver powers and save valuable energy.

Figure 4: Simplified example of signal degradation in a fiber link between two modules. Sources of loss include fiber connectors, splices, and intrinsic fiber attenuation. The performance margin is the difference between the expected Rx power and the receiver sensitivity. Higher-speed links (green) need a high Tx power and performance margin. Lower-speed links (red) can use a lower Tx power and performance margin.

Another related sustainability feature is deciding whether to operate on low- or high-power mode depending on the optical link budget and fiber length. For example, if the transceiver needs to operate at its maximum capacity, a programmable interface can be controlled remotely to set the amplifiers at their maximum power. However, if the operator uses the transceiver for just half of the maximum capacity, the transceiver can operate with a smaller residual margin and use lower power on the amplifier. The transceiver uses energy more efficiently and sustainably by adapting to these circumstances.

If the industry wants interoperability between different transceiver vendors, these kinds of power parameters for remote management and control should also be standardized.

Takeaways

As edge networks get bigger and more complex, network operators and designers need more knobs and degrees of freedom to optimize network architecture and performance and thus scale networks cost-effectively.

The new generation of transceivers has the tools for remote provisioning, management, and control, which gives optical networks more degrees of freedom for optimization and reduces the need for expensive truck rolls. These benefits make edge networks simpler, more affordable, and more sustainable to build and operate.

Tags: access network, capacity, cost, distributed access networks, DWDM, inventory stock, Loss of signal, maintenance, monitor, optical networks, plug-and-play, remote, remote control, scale, scaling, self-tuning, time

How To Make a Photonic Integrated Circuit

Insights

November 30, 2022

How To Make a Photonic Integrated Circuit

Photonics is one of the enabling technologies of the future. Light is the fastest information…

Photonics is one of the enabling technologies of the future. Light is the fastest information carrier in the universe and can transmit this information while dissipating less heat and energy than electrical signals. Thus, photonics can dramatically increase the speed, reach, and flexibility of communication networks and cope with the ever-growing demand for more data. And it will do so at a lower energy cost, decreasing the Internet’s carbon footprint. Meanwhile, fast and efficient photonic signals have massive potential for sensing and imaging applications in medical devices, automotive LIDAR, agricultural and food diagnostics, and more.

Given its importance, we want to explain how photonic integrated circuits (PICs), the devices that enable all these applications, are made.

Designing a PIC

The process of designing a PIC should translate an initial application concept into a functioning photonics chip that can be manufactured. In a short course at the OFC 2018 conference, Wim Bogaerts from Ghent University summarized the typical PIC design process in the steps we will describe below.

Figure 1 Summary of the steps in a PIC design flow process

Concept and Specifications: We first have to define what goes into the chip. A chip architect normally spends time with the customer to understand what the customer wants to achieve with the chip and all the conditions and situations where the chip will be used. After these conversations, the chip application concept becomes a concrete set of specifications that are passed on to the team that will design the internals of the chip. These specs will set the performance targets of the PIC design.
Design Function: Having defined the specs, the design team will develop a schematic circuit diagram that captures the function of the PIC. This diagram is separated into several functional blocks: some of them might already exist, and some of them might have to be built. These blocks include lasers, modulators, detectors, and other components that can manipulate light in one way or another.
Design Simulation: Making a chip costs a lot of money and time. With such risks, a fundamental element of chip design is to accurately predict the chip’s behavior after it is manufactured. The functional blocks are placed together, and their behavior is simulated using various physical models and simulation tools. The design team often uses a few different simulation approaches to reduce the risk of failure after manufacturing.
Design Layout: Now, the design team must translate the functional chip schematic into a proper design layout that can be manufactured. The layout consists of layers, component positions, and geometric shapes that represent the actual manufacturing steps. The team uses software that translates these functions into the geometric patterns to be manufactured, with human input required for the trickiest placement and geometry decisions.
Check Design Rules: Every chip fabrication facility will have its own set of manufacturing rules. In this step, the design team verifies that the layout agrees with these rules.
Verify Design Function: This is a final check to ensure that the layout actually performs as was originally intended in the original circuit schematic. The layout process usually leads to new component placement and parasitic effects that were not considered in the original circuit schematic. These tests might require the design team to revisit previous functional or layout schematic steps.

The Many Steps of Fabricating a PIC

Manufacturing semiconductor chips for photonics and electronics is one of the most complex procedures in the world. For example, back in his university days, EFFECT Photonics President Boudewijn Docter described a fabrication process with a total of 243 steps!

Yuqing Jiao, Associate Professor at the Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e), explains the fabrication process in a few basic, simplified steps:

Grow or deposit your chip material
Print a pattern on the material
Etch the printed pattern into your material
Do some cleaning and extra surface preparation
Go back to step 1 and repeat as needed

Real life is, of course, a lot more complicated and will require cycling through these steps tens of times, leading to processes with more than 200 total steps. Let’s go through these basic steps in a bit more detail.

Figure 2 Basic steps of a semiconductor fabrication process that are repeated in a single fabrication cycle. An entire wafer manufacturing process requires tens of these cycles.

Layer Epitaxy and Deposition: Different chip elements require different semiconductor material layers. These layers can be grown on the semiconductor wafer via a process called epitaxy or deposited via other methods (which are summarized in this article).

Figure 3: Simplified example of PIC elements and the different material layers they require. Source: Smit et al. (2014)

Lithography (i.e. printing): There are a few lithography methods, but the one used for high-volume chip fabrication is projection optical lithography. The semiconductor wafer is coated with a photosensitive polymer film called a photoresist. Meanwhile, the design layout pattern is transferred to an opaque material called a mask. The optical lithography system projects the mask pattern onto the photoresist. The exposed photoresist is then developed (like photographic film) to complete the pattern printing.

Figure 4 Comparison of different optical lithography approaches. Contact and proximity printing keep the mask in contact with or close to the sample. Projection printing keeps the mask further away and is initially more expensive, but it is the technology of choice for high-volume manufacturing. Source: J. Shen, University of Waterloo PhD Thesis (2018)

Etching: Having “printed” the pattern on the photoresist, it is time to remove (or etch) parts of the semiconductor material to transfer the pattern from the resist into the wafer. There are several techniques that can be done to etch the material, which are summarized in this article.

Figure 5: Example of what a semiconductor wafer with resist (red color) on top of it looks like before and after an etching step.

Cleaning and Surface Preparation: After etching, a series of steps will clean and prepare the surface before the next cycle.
- Passivation: Adding layers of dielectric material (such a silica) to “passivate” the chip and make it more tolerant to environmental effects.
- Planarization: Making the surface flat in preparation of future lithography and etching steps.
- Metallization: Depositing metal components and films on the wafer. This might be done for future lithography and etching steps, or at the end to add electrical contacts to the chip.

Figure 6 summarizes how an InP photonic device looks after the steps of layer epitaxy, etching, dielectric deposition and planarization, and metallization.

Figure 6 Cross-section of a semiconductor wafer structure after: (a) epitaxial growth, (b) etching, (c) passivation and planarization, (d) metallization.

The Expensive Process of Testing and Packaging

Chip fabrication is a process with many sources of variability, and therefore much testing is required to make sure that the fabricated chip agrees with what was originally designed and simulated. Once that is certified and qualified, the process of packaging and assembling a device with the PIC follows.

While packaging, assembly, and testing are only a small part of the cost of electronic systems, the reverse happens with photonic systems. Researchers at the Technical University of Eindhoven (TU/e) estimate that for most Indium Phosphide (InP) photonics devices, the cost of packaging, assembly, and testing can reach around 80% of the total module cost. There are many research efforts in motion to reduce these costs, which you can learn more about in one of our previous articles.

Figure 7. Process cost breakdown of an InP PIC-based module as a percentage of the overall cost of manufacturing. Source: Latkowski et al., 2019

Especially after the first fabrication run of a new chip, there will be a few rounds of characterization, validation and revisions to make sure the chip performs up to spec. After this first round of characterization and validation, the chip must be made ready for mass production, which requires a series of reliability tests in several environmental different conditions. You can learn more about this process in our previous article on industrial hardening. For example, different applications need different certification of the temperatures in which the chip must operate in.

Temperature Standard	Temperature Range (°C)
Temperature Standard	Min	Max
Commercial (C-temp)	0	70
Extended (E-temp)	-20	85
Industrial (I-temp)	-40	85
Automotive / Full Military	-40	125

Table 1: Comparing the temperature ranges of different temperature hardening standards, including industrial and automotive/full military applications

Takeaways

The process of making photonic integrated circuits is incredibly long and complex, and the steps we described in this article are a mere simplification of the entire process. It requires tremendous amount of knowledge in chip design, fabrication, and testing from experts in different fields all around the world. EFFECT Photonics was founded by people who fabricated these chips themselves, understand the process intimately, and developed the connections and network to develop cutting-edge PICs at scale.

Tags: building blocks, c-temp, coherent, die testing, DSP, electron beam lithography, faults, I-temp, imprint lithography, InP, interfaces, optical lithography, reach, scale, wafer testing

Insights

November 2, 2022

Leveraging Electronic Ecosystems in Photonics

Thanks to wafer-scale technology, electronics have driven down the cost per transistor for many decades.…

Thanks to wafer-scale technology, electronics have driven down the cost per transistor for many decades. This allowed the world to enjoy chips that every generation became smaller and provided exponentially more computing power for the same amount of money. This scale-up process is how everyone now has a computer processor in their pocket that is millions of times more powerful than the most advanced computers of the 1960s that landed men on the moon.

This progress in electronics integration is a key factor that brought down the size and cost of coherent transceivers, packing more bits than ever into smaller areas. However, photonics has struggled to keep up with electronics, with the photonic components dominating the cost of transceivers. If the transceiver cost curve does not continue to decrease, it will be challenging to achieve the goal of making them more accessible across the entire optical network.

To trigger a revolution in the use of photonics worldwide, it needs to be as easy to use as electronics. In the words of our Chief Technology Officer:

We need to buy photonics from a catalog as we do with electronics, have datasheets that work consistently, be able to solder it to a board and integrate it easily with the rest of the product design flow.
Tim Koene – Chief Technology Officer

This goal requires photonics manufacturing to leverage existing electronics manufacturing processes and ecosystems. Photonics must embrace fabless models, chips that can survive soldering steps, and electronic packaging and assembly methods.

The Advantages of Moving to a Fabless Model

Increasing the volume of photonics manufacturing is a big challenge. Some photonic chip developers manufacture their chips in-house within their fabrication facilities. This approach has some substantial advantages, giving component manufacturers complete control over their production process.

Figure-vertically-integrated — Figure 1: Simplified value chain diagram of a vertically-integrated optical transceiver developer. The developer handles the PIC design, manufacturing, and packaging.

However, this approach has its trade-offs when scaling up. If a vertically-integrated chip developer wants to scale up in volume, they must make a hefty capital expenditure (CAPEX) in more equipment and personnel. They must develop new fabrication processes as well as develop and train personnel. Fabs are not only expensive to build but to operate. Unless they can be kept at nearly full utilization, operating expenses (OPEX) also drain the facility owners’ finances.

Especially in the case of an optical transceiver market that is not as big as that of consumer electronics, it’s hard not to wonder whether that initial investment is cost-effective. For example, LightCounting estimates that 55 million optical transceivers were sold in 2021, while the International Data Corporation estimates that 1.4 billion smartphones were sold in 2021. The latter figure is 25 times larger than that of the transceiver market.

Electronics manufacturing experienced a similar problem during their 70s and 80s boom, with smaller chip start-ups facing almost insurmountable barriers to market entry because of the massive CAPEX required. Furthermore, the large-scale electronics manufacturing foundries had excess production capacity that drained their OPEX. The large-scale foundries ended up selling that excess capacity to the smaller chip developers, who became fabless. In this scenario, everyone ended up winning. The foundries serviced multiple companies and could run their facilities at total capacity, while the fabless companies could outsource manufacturing and reduce their expenditures.

This fabless model, with companies designing and selling the chips but outsourcing the manufacturing, should also be the way to go for photonics. Instead of going through a more costly, time-consuming process, the troubles of scaling up for photonics developers are outsourced and (from the perspective of the fabless company) become as simple as putting a purchase order in place. Furthermore, the fabless model allows photonics developers to concentrate their R&D resources on the end market. This is the simplest way forward if photonics moves into million-scale volumes.

Adopting Electronics-Style Packaging

While packaging, assembly, and testing are only a small part of the cost of electronic systems, the reverse happens with photonic integrated circuits (PICs). Researchers at the Technical University of Eindhoven (TU/e) estimate that for most Indium Phosphide (InP) photonics devices, the cost of packaging, assembly, and testing can reach around 80% of the total module cost.

Graph-InP-PIC-based-module-breakdown — Figure 2 . Process cost breakdown of an InP PIC-based module as a percentage of the overall manufacturing cost. Source: Latkowski et al., 2019

To become more accessible and affordable, the photonics manufacturing chain must become more automated and standardized. The lack of automation makes manufacturing slower and prevents data collection that can be used for process control, optimization, and standardization.

One of the best ways to reach these automation and standardization goals is to learn from electronics packaging, assembly, and testing methods that are already well-known and standardized. After all, building a special production line is much more expensive than modifying an existing production flow.

There are several ways in which photonics packaging, assembly, and testing can be made more affordable and accessible. Below are a few examples:

Passive alignments: Connecting optical fiber to PICs is one of optical devices’ most complicated packaging and assembly problems. The best alignments are usually achieved via active alignment processes in which feedback from the PIC is used to align the fiber better. Passive alignment processes do not use such feedback. They cannot achieve the best possible alignment but are much more affordable.
BGA-style packaging: Ball-grid array packaging has grown popular among electronics manufacturers. It places the chip connections under the chip package, allowing more efficient use of space in circuit boards, a smaller package size, and better soldering.
Flip-chip bonding: A process where solder bumps are deposited on the chip in the final fabrication step. The chip is flipped over and aligned with a circuit board for easier soldering.

These might be novel technologies for photonics developers who have started implementing them in the last five or ten years. However, the electronics industry embraced these technologies 20 or 30 years ago. Making these techniques more widespread will make a massive difference in photonics’ ability to scale up and become as available as electronics.

Making Photonics Chips That Can Survive Soldering

Soldering remains another tricky step for photonics assembly and packaging. Photonics device developers usually custom order a PIC, then wire and die bond to the electronics. However, some elements in the PIC cannot handle soldering temperatures, making it difficult to solder into an electronics board. Developers often must glue the chip onto the board with a non-standard process that needs additional verification for reliability.

This goes back to the issue of process standardization. Current PICs often use different materials and processes from electronics, such as optical fiber connections and metals for chip interconnects, that cannot survive a standard soldering process.

Adopting BGA-style packaging and flip-chip bonding techniques will make it easier for PICs to survive this soldering process. There is ongoing research and development worldwide, including at EFFECT Photonics, to make fiber coupling and other PIC aspects compatible with these electronic packaging methods.

PICs that can handle being soldered to circuit boards will allow the industry to build optical subassemblies that can be made more readily available in the open market and can go into trains, cars, or airplanes.

Takeaways

Photonics must leverage existing electronics ecosystems and processes to scale up and have a greater global impact. Tim Koene, explains what this means:

Photonics technology needs to integrate more electronic functionalities into the same package. It needs to build photonic integration and packaging support that plays by the rules of existing electronic manufacturing ecosystems. It needs to be built on a semiconductor manufacturing process that can produce millions of chips in a month.

As soon as photonics can achieve these larger production volumes, it can reach price points and improvements in quality and yield closer to those of electronics. When we show the market that photonics can be as easy to use as electronics, that will trigger a revolution in its worldwide use.
Our Chief Technology Officer, Tim Koene

This vision is one of our guiding lights at EFFECT Photonics, where we aim to develop optical systems that can have an impact all over the world in many different applications.

Tags: automotive sector, BGA style packaging, compatible, computing power, cost per mm, efficient, electronic, electronic board, electronics, fabless, Photonics, risk, scale, soldering, transistor, wafer scale

Telecom/Datacom

Emerging Industries

DSP & FEC

Ultra Pure Light Sources

Ecosystems

Pluggable Modules – Direct Detect

Pluggable Modules – Coherent

Sub-Assemblies

ASICs

View All

Insights

Press Releases

In the News

Events

Careers

Knowledge Center

Company Info

Contact Us

Takeaways

Telecom/Datacom

Emerging Industries

DSP & FEC

Ultra Pure Light Sources

Ecosystems

Pluggable Modules – Direct Detect

Pluggable Modules – Coherent

Sub-Assemblies

ASICs

View All

Insights

Press Releases

In the News

Events

Careers

Knowledge Center

Company Info

Contact Us